Showing posts with label Story. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Story. Show all posts

Sep 20, 2026

The Love for the Dog

The call was on Sundays, and it was three minutes long.

You lined up behind the warden’s office where the black telephone sat on a stool under a cloth like something holy, and when your turn came you dialled the code and the number and had one hundred and eighty seconds, which the warden counted on his own watch and not on yours. Manu had learned to spend them carefully. He no longer wasted the first ten crying, the way he had in June. Now he said Amma once, cleanly, and got straight to the business of her voice.

“Are you eating?”

“I’m eating.”

“The morning ganji also? Not leaving it?”

“I’m drinking it, Amma.”

“Chinnu, you sound thin even on the phone.”

Nobody sounds thin on a phone. But he understood what she meant. She could hear the hostel in him, the early bell, the cold bath, the boiled rice and Mangalore sambar that was never her rice-and-sambar. From four hundred kilometres away, across the ghats, she was trying to reach through the wire and press her palm to his forehead. He let her try. The warden turned his wrist. Two minutes gone.

On the other six nights he had another way of hearing her.

It was a small red hardbound Gitanjali, Tagore’s own English, that had been hers before it was his. She had taught school before she married, and her maiden name was inside the cover in a younger hand than the one he knew. All through it, in pencil gone grey, she had underlined the lines that had once meant something to a girl he had never met. He read it under the sheet with a torch after lights-off. He did not always understand it, but if he read her underlinings slowly he could hear the book in her voice, and that was the closest to her lullaby he could manifest in that hostel room. Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high – that one she had underlined twice, with a star. He had it by heart before the periodic table, which would have horrified his father.

His father farmed a few acres near Tumakuru. Coconut, a little areca, ragi in the years when the rains refused to kiss the earth. His whole life was the narrow bright hope that his son would not have to plough the unkissed earth. It was a good decade for that hope. The country had been coming open for some years now. An uncanny scholar on his way to monkhood had ended up as the Prime Minister, when Manu was small, had torn up the old licence regime that kept everything slow and grey. Now an orator whose most potent weapon was poetry was the Prime Minister and he was pushing the same door wider. A great four-lane highway crossing the land within a morning of their fields, black-top climbing to villages that had never had a road, and, the marvel of marvels, the telephone gone cheap. His father did not read much of this in the paper. He saw it in the ground — the survey crews with their tripods, the neighbour’s son back from Bangalore in a collared shirt, earning in a month what the farm made in a season. He saw a single narrow staircase rising out of the red soil, and he meant to set his son’s foot on it before the country changed its mind, even if it cost him a strip of the land to do it and which, in the end, it did. The hope came out as science, the letters PCMB (abbreviated for Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Biology) standing over Manu’s timetable like a weather system. Everything bent toward the entrance exams two years off and already casting a shadow.

The residential school for Class 11 and 12 stood on a laterite hill above the coast, an hour from Mangalore. It belonged to a math — an old religious institution with a Swamiji whose garlanded photograph hung in every classroom. Before light each morning they sat in the prayer hall and recited the shlokas, and the sound of two hundred boys chanting in the salt air was, Manu admitted, a beautiful thing, even with your knees aching and your stomach loud.

The school was famous in three districts for its results. That was why his father had sold the land and sent him here, past a hundred closer colleges. They make ranks there, his father had said, as another man might say they make steel. Manu was the family’s plan for the future. It was a heavy thing to be, at sixteen.

------****------

Washing day was Sunday, after the call.

There was a line of stone slabs behind the dormitory and a tap that ran two hours in the morning and two at night, and every boy had a choice: wash his own clothes, or give them to the dhobi in the village, who charged by the piece. Almost nobody did. The dhobi’s fee was the same money that bought inland letters and STD calls – the money that carried your voice home. Every boy learned quickly the exchange rate of his own longing: a week of blistered knuckles on the stone was one more long Sunday call, or three letters, or a letter and a call with a little left over. So they knelt at the slabs and beat their shirts against the stone and saved the fee for their mothers.

The whole efficiency of washing depended on the brush. Most boys had the flexible kind, thin bristles that bent in every way but refused to put a fight against the stain on the clothes, so that a dirty collar took an hour. Manu had a good one. The right hardware in his hand, though he was clueless about it. Bristles like a boar’s, that took the mud from a hem in three strokes. It was, though Manu did not yet know it, the most valuable thing he owned.

Which was how Ravi came into his life.

Ravi was a clerk’s son. His father kept the ledgers at a cooperative bank in a small town near Hasan. He missed home too, but in a smaller, drier way than Manu — the way you miss a tooth that has been pulled: he did not cry after the Sunday call, he rationed his longing as he rationed everything. He liked to say that homesickness was a luxury item and he had not budgeted for it. He had studied Manu’s brush for two Sundays with the frank calculation of a man pricing a bullock. On the third he sat down at the next slab, put out his hand, and said, “Lend me that. I’ll be your friend.”

“That’s not how friends …”

“It’s exactly how friends,” said Ravi, already taking it. “You have a good brush and no friends. I have friends and a bad brush. This is called trade. The country is opening, haven’t you heard? Everybody’s at it.” He scrubbed his shirt clean in four strokes, sighed like a man who had glimpsed God, and handed it back. From then on he was there every Sunday, and then most days, and the trade quietly became the thing it had been pretending not to be.

------****------

The English teacher was a man named Shenoy.

He was not what a boy imagines when he imagines an inspiring teacher. He did not stride or thunder. He came in a little stooped, with a jute bag and a flask of black coffee, and taught in a low voice that made you lean forward, so the leaning became a kind of attention he never had to demand. He wore the same two weak-tea-coloured shirts turn and turn about. When he was pleased he did not smile so much as stop frowning, and you learned to watch for the stopping.

He had one rule, and it had cost every boy money: each would buy the unabridged Oxford dictionary from the hostel store. “The big one”, he said, holding up his own 1970s edition, thick as a brick, its grey boards worn soft at the corners, “not the pocket thing your cousin gave you” — and then carry it to the binder in the village to have it bound in hard board, because a paper spine would not survive one monsoon of hostel hands, and he meant these books to last a lifetime. Dictionary and binding together came to a real sum. There were letters home and finally the boys had the doorstopper on their desks. The method was simple and, the boys agreed, diabolical: when Shenoy met a word a boy did not know, he would not tell him. Look it up. Then read it out. Loud. For everyone. So the class inched through literature at the pace of the slowest looker-up, forty boys waiting while one slid his finger down the columns - perspective, noun, a particular attitude towards something. Shenoy nodding, again, until the word belonged to the boy who had found it.

“He doesn’t know the meanings himself,” Ravi announced, with total confidence, the first week. “That’s the whole racket. He can’t, so he makes us do it and we say thank you, sir. Beautiful.” Manu laughed with the rest. The boys would come to understand with time, which none of them could have said aloud — that a man might make you do a hard thing forty times because he wanted the hard thing to be yours, and not his.

What the theories missed was how much world Shenoy carried into that room. The syllabus said grammar, précis, one play. He taught as if every book ever written were one long argument human beings were still having with themselves, and he would not stay inside the fence.

He gave them a poem by an Englishman named Shelley, about a traveller who finds, half-sunk in a desert, two vast stone legs and the shattered face of a statue — an ancient emperor, Ozymandias, who had once had it carved on the base that he was king of kings, and that the mighty should look on his works and despair. Around the wreck, nothing: bare sand to the horizon. The works were gone; only the broken boast remained. “You have all seen this,” Shenoy told them. “Every one of you has passed a ruined fort on some hill where a king once sat who was sure he would last forever.” The boys nodded; the hills were full of such forts. The poem, he said, was simply that hill fort put into fourteen lines, laughing very quietly at the word forever.

He often spoke to them of the epic Mahabharata. “Not the television one,” he said, “the real one, that does not let its heroes off after the war”. The day he told them its end, the boys forgot to be bored.

“After the whole war,” Shenoy said, “after everyone is dead, the eldest brother climbs the mountain to heaven. One by one the others fall on the way. Only a dog follows him to the top. At the gate the he is welcomed, but asked to leave the dog. And Yuddhistira who has lost his brothers, his wife, his kingdom, everyone chooses not to. I will not buy heaven by abandoning something that trusted me and followed me here.” He looked at them. “That is the summit of the whole epic. Not the war. Not the empire. A tired man at the gate of heaven refusing to leave a stray dog out in the cold. The dog, it turns out, was dharma all along.”

He set the flask down.

“And do not think this is only our idea. On the far side of the world, in the oldest poem the Greeks have, another war hero comes home – Odysseus, twenty years gone, ten of them at Troy and ten lost at sea. When at last he reaches his own door he comes disguised in beggar’s rags, so not one soul recognizes him: not his wife, not his servants. Argos, the pup he had raised before he sailed, now old and half-blind on a heap of dung by the gate, eaten with ticks, lifts his head, knows his master under the rags where no human can, wags his tail once and dies.”

Forty boys had gone still.

“Two epics, two victors of great wars - one at the gate of heaven, one at the gate of his own house - and in both, at the very end, it is a dog that tells you the truth about the man. The war poems make them heroes. The dog is how the poem finds out whether the hero is still human. Whether, after all that killing, you can be faithful to a creature that can do nothing for you and only loves you.” He capped the flask. “When men tell you greatness is the height you climb, remember the oldest poems measured it the other way. By the love for the dog.”

Shenoy had opinions, but never the ones the staff room expected, because they belonged to no side. When a boy repeated an uncle’s line about strong leaders and the country needing a firm hand, he put down his chalk and quoted Bertolt Brecht – “Unhappy the nation that needs heroes.”

------****------

It was a rainy, gloomy Tuesday afternoon. Shenoy read the marks the boys had the scored on the test, in his flat voice. At Ravi’s name the number stirred murmurs.

“Ravi, Fifteen.”

It was said that in all these years no boy had gotten more than fifteen out of twenty from Shenoy. Fifteen was the ceiling of the sky. And Ravi had hit that ceiling. But Shenoy went on nonchalantly.

“Manu. Eighteen.”

That paused the room. Someone actually said eh? Shenoy mentioned a number over fifteen! The ceiling in Shenoy’s legend was breached by a homesick farmer’s son who could not do a projectile-motion sum to save his life.

As the boys packed up, Shenoy said, not looking at him: “Your third paragraph. You argue that history is largely a negotiated settlement and truth is at most an approximation. Where did you learn to write like that?”

Hot in the face, Manu told the truth, because he did not know how to do anything else in that room - the red book under the sheet, his mother’s underlinings, where the mind is without fear.

Shenoy went still. Then he did a thing Manu had never seen: he recited the rest of it from memory, unasked - the poet’s prayer for a country where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls, where knowledge is free and reason has not lost its way - looking out at the rain, as if it were private. When he finished, he was quiet a while.

“Keep reading her book. You have learnt a thing that matters: that a sentence can carry a whole idea of the world without once raising its voice.”

------****------

Manu signed up for the essay competition for a reason that had nothing to do with essays.

The circular said the district round would be held in Mangalore. One day out in the city, one bus, the school’s best in each event. And behind the word Mangalore, Manu did not see a competition. He saw a city with a board on every second shop, STD ISD PCO, and inside each a glass cabin with a red meter that ticked, where a boy with forty rupees folded into his sock could talk not for a hundred and eighty counted seconds but for as long as the coins held. Morning. After lunch. Before the bus turned back up the ghat. He could hear his mother three times in a single day.

He wrote home on an inland letter, pressing hard, so the words would come through on the far side. “Amma. On the fourteenth, I will be in Mangalore. Stay near the phone the whole day. I will call and call.” She wrote back to assure she would sit beside it with her knitting and not stir, and that she had worshipped the God of Dharmasthala to make his essay good, and to eat.

The topic, when it was named, was the kind these things always are - the idea of India. Manu carried his first draft to Shenoy on a Thursday, in the last gold hour of the light. He had opened it, because it seemed a grand way to begin, with the poem everyone half-knew - the one by the orator Prime Minister, that asked the people to light the lamp again and drive the dark back out of the house. Shenoy read it standing, twice, and set his pencil - never a red pen - beneath one small word.

“Whose house?”

“Sir?”

“You have written our house. The poem says the house. Not ours; not only the houses like ours.” He tapped the page once. “You have made the poet smaller than he is. Give him back his whole house.” He handed the sheet back. “And quote any poet, Manu, but garland none. A garland hides the neck it is put on. Remember to love the poem for what it says and not for who the poet is. That is the only honest love, and the only kind worth the ink.”

------****------

Mangalore, on the fourteenth, was hot and enormous and loud with horns. Ravi had come too. He was leading the school’s volleyball team. He was ferocity and skill in equal measure on the field. The two of them, loosed in a city for a day, carried the same secret plan, which had nothing to do with any prize and everything to do with the boards on the corners. Manu wrote his essay under a fan that did not reach him, gave the poet back his whole house, and did not think once about the marks. He thought about the booth. He found one in the two hours before the results, a green cabin at the mouth of a stationery shop, fed the man ten rupees, folded himself into the glass, and dialled; and his mother picked up on the half-ring, because she had been sitting beside the phone since morning.

“Chinnu!”

“Amma, it’s me, I’m in Mangalore …”

“Have you eaten? Since morning, have you eaten anything at all?”

They talked, the red digits climbing, and it did not matter, because he had bought them on purpose. He called again after lunch. He was in the same cabin, feeding it another ten rupees, when Ravi came pounding down the road, red-faced from his own call or from the running — Ravi had known without being told where to look, in a booth, of course, where else — shouting that the district was his, first place, and first place went up to the state round.

And the state round was in Bangalore. Two hours from Tumakuru. Two hours from home, from his mother, who was in his ear that very second asking what, what has happened.

“Amma,” he said, and his voice did the thing it had done in June. “I won. I’m coming to Bangalore. I’ll come home. I’ll see you.”

He heard her set the receiver against her chest — the muffled sea-sound of a mother’s heart heard close — and the meter ticked on, the best money he had ever spent.

He carried the news up the hill to Shenoy first, in the empty room in the low gold light. Shenoy put down his pencil, and the frown went all the way off his face, which on that face was a kind of sunrise. “You’ll go home, then,” he said. “You’ll see your amma.” That was all. He did not come with them to Bangalore; the school found its reasons, and Manu did not think, then, to ask what they were.

------****------

Then the largest democracy went to its voting. When the counting was done the man with the poems was no longer the Prime Minister. The boys went on with their calculus and their praying for ranks as though nothing under the sun had shifted, because for them it was the results of their exams that mattered and not that of the elections. There were new photographs in the papers the warden left on the bench, new names on the radio of an evening. The monsoon came down the coast and washed the walls clean of last season’s posters, and it was long after the rains, the sky gone high and rinsed, that the letter came calling Manu to Bangalore for the final.

Manu had chosen to open this one, too, with a poem, again from that poet who was no longer the Prime Minister. A poem about the great peaks: the tallest of them, where the snow never goes, where nothing grows and no bird will build and no traveller, however tired, can climb high enough to rest. The poet, who might have set himself upon any summit he pleased, prays to be brought a little lower — down to where the trees still hold, and a man can bend to take a stranger in his arms. Manu had carried it over from the Hindi into his own English as best he could, and it came out stiff in the joints — a boy's translation, true to the imagery and the plain sense, but not yet able to catch the thing that makes a poem a poem: the meaning that lives in the gaps between the lines, unspoken, at once political and philosophical, that no dictionary explains, and that makes men of boys by the time they can carry it across.

Shenoy read it twice and did not reach for the grammar first. “You have the meaning,” he said. “Now find the nerve of it. He is not describing a mountain, Manu. He is refusing one. Every man you meet will want the highest place — to stand so far up that nothing can reach him. And here is one who had climbed as high as this country lets a man climb, saying: not so high; that high is only snow; leave me where something can still grow, where a tired man can sit down beside me.” He handed the sheet back. “Write it so the reader feels the cold at the summit and the warmth below it in the one breath. That is the whole poem. That is the argument, if you care to know it — the only one worth making about any height a man is offered.” The frown lifted, briefly. “You will read it better in twenty years. And worse, when the climbing is your own.”

Bangalore in the early morning was colder than the coast ever grew. Thirty of them sat in a hall to pen their essays, winners from each district, arguing for the democracy of their dreams.

Manu voiced an aspiration more than a dream. He took the ruined forts on their own hills; he asked for a nation supple enough to bend in the wind and the storm and not break; he wanted the honesty of the old epic that loved its heroes too well to let them off, and a greatness measured not by the height a man climbs but by whether, at the summit of the last mountain, he will leave the dog. He wrote that the country he wanted was one brave enough to tell itself the many lived truths — to set no ruler on a pedestal his deeds could not carry, to gild no one — and that such a country, if it ever came, would be low enough to walk home to in the evening, to a lit doorway, to someone waiting with her hand held out to feel whether you had a fever. He did not write that he meant his mother. He did not have to.

------****------

That afternoon, while the thirty were loosed on the city, three people who had to choose sat in a room above the hall and could not, at first, agree. Twenty-nine essays they had set aside; the thirtieth lay in the middle of the table and would not let them alone.

“It is the best thing here,” said the schoolmaster on the panel, a tired man who read hundreds of these in a year. “It is not close.”

“No one says it isn’t well made.” The second, a careful man from the department, turned the first page without reading it. “I say look where it comes from.” The name of the school stood at the head of the form; they all knew the kind of place it was. “And how the boy opens it. With him. That poem. This year, of all years.” He let the year hang there, the way everyone had lately learned to leave it. “There are committees sitting even now, going through the books line by line, deciding who stays golden and who comes out. And you would put a prize in the hand of a child from a school like that, for reading the way this one reads. You don’t think somebody, somewhere, keeps a list?”

“It does not gild the man,” the schoolmaster said. “It reads him truer than the ones who shout his name.”

“It opens with him.”

The old woman in the chair had not yet spoken. She had been teaching longer than either of them had been alive, and when she laid her hand flat on the page the two men went quiet. “The boy took a poem about a mountain,” she said, “and saw that the poet was refusing the mountain. He hung no garland on the man and tore none off him — he read him clear of every flag that others have wound round him. There is an aspiration he voices which is beyond the individual, beyond the ideology. Genuine aspiration is the one thing, the only thing, we are sitting here to reward.” She turned to the careful man. “You would deny him for the letterhead on his page and the temper of the year. That is not judgement. That is the very thing the poem is warning us against — the cold at the top, where nothing grows.” She slid the essay to the centre of the table. “As the chair, I award it the first place. And if anyone should ask, you may say the old lady insisted.”

------****------

There was no holiday in it, no going home in triumph. There was only an afternoon and a night before the buses turned back, and home was two hours down the very highway his father had watched them build. So he did the sum the way he had once done it in a green booth in Mangalore, and stole it — a bus at dusk, a bus before light, a few hours in the fold between. He told no one at the event. He was not there to receive the prize the panel had awarded. He did not even telephone ahead.

He got down at the familiar stop as the light was going, and walked the lane he could have walked blind, and a lamp was already burning in the one doorway, and his mother was in it before he reached the gate, because she had heard the bus; she always heard the bus. She did not ask about the essay. She put both her hands to his face and laid one flat on his forehead — the old test that four hundred kilometres had cheated her of all year — and asked what she had asked down the wire every Sunday for a year.

“Have you eaten?”

“I’ve eaten, Amma.”

“You’re thin.”

“I’m not thin.”

He was thin. He let her not believe him. He had four hours. He spent them at her table saying nothing much, which is the best kind of saying, and before light she filled a steel tiffin with ganji he did not need and would not refuse, and stood in the lit doorway until the bus took the turn and the lane went dark behind him.

------****------

He came back up to the coast the next morning. Only to discover he had won the prize and lost the teacher. Shenoy's room had another man in it, a brisk young master who marked in red and told the boys straight out what the words meant, so that no time was wasted. Shenoy sir, they said, was suspended. There had been a textbook committee, and Shenoy had refused to sign off the inclusion of a hagiography of a hero.

Manu had to run to his desk to find out what the word meant. Ravi was already there, the dictionary open. Manu ran his finger down the column — hag, haggard, haggis, haggle, hagiography — then across it: hagiography, noun. a book about a person's life that praises them too much; this kind of writing.

Ravi set a slim taped book on the desk beside it. “He left it with me,” he said, before Manu could ask. “For you. Said you’d come looking.” He turned it over: old, the spine mended, poems by a name neither of them had heard before — Kahlil Gibran.

Manu sat on the desk beside him. For a while neither of them said anything.

“He should have signed it,” Manu said at last, and the heat in his own voice surprised him. “Whatever it was. One chapter. One lie in one book among a hundred. He could have signed it and stayed, and taught for twenty more years — two thousand more boys to look things up, to garland no one. That is more good than being right about a dead king in a room with no boys left in it.” His voice thinned. “He threw that German line at us once — unhappy the nation that needs heroes. Well, I didn’t need a hero. I needed a teacher, at the front of this room, on Monday. And he taught us himself how you weigh a man — not by the war he wins or the height he climbs, but by whether he’ll leave the dog. Yudhishthira wouldn’t, at the very gate of heaven. And then he climbed up to his own heaven, being right, and left us at the gate. We were the dog, Ravi. Forty of us, every morning. He chose to be right, and he left the dog out in the cold.”

Ravi turned the book over a long moment, and when he spoke it was not his joking voice.

“Left the dog.” He weighed the words like coins. “You’ve got it the wrong way round. If he’d signed and stayed, he’d have kept the dog by his chair and fed it a lie every morning — the man who told you to garland no one, laying a garland on somebody to keep his own seat, and calling it staying for your sake. That is not faith with the dog, Manu. That is the comfortable way to betray it.” He tapped the taped spine of the book. “You know what he taught, better than any of us; you just don’t want it today, because you’re the one he left. Some things you can’t buy the cheap version of. He said that about the dictionary. Turns out he meant it about everything.”

Manu had no answer that would hold. He took the book because his hands wanted something to carry. On the flyleaf, in the hand he knew from the margins of his essay drafts, was written only: Admire the worthy poem irrespective of the poet. He let it fall open where it would, the way you do with a book you are exploring for the first time, and read the lines his thumb had come to rest against.

“The teacher who walks in the shadow of the temple, among his followers, gives not of his wisdom but rather of his faith and his lovingness.

If he is indeed wise he does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but rather leads you to the threshold of your own mind.”



------****------

Dec 1, 2019

Complexity of love



A middle aged couple watch the sunset on a beach off Kochi, Kerala (PC: Myself!)

The angel and the devil were grappling to understand the complexity of love.

"Is not failure the essence of love? You fail to be yourself. The loved one fails to be the one who was loved as they evolve while they reciprocate love."

"Is it all not creation, evolution and discovery? Why brand it failure?"

"Because it is! So selfish is love that it consumes itself, constrains the ones in love from being the ones they truly are. It is a baggage of expectations."

"Really? Love is rather so selfless that it creates new worlds, allows the ones in love to flourish and grow beyond the ones they are. It is a source of nourishment."

"But it is such a transient thing. It changes with every moment. It gives rise to multiple expectations. It is so dynamic, fickle. Never stable. The adaptation, adjustment gradually robs you off from your soul. I am afraid if the price of love is the very reason it blossomed in the first place."

"Is not that transience worth it all? Like the essence of our lives which is transience. Love does not keep the seed a seed but nurtures, lets it bloom and flourish into a tree. Maybe allowing it to be a part of the forest."

"Honestly, does not love in the real rugged world constrain, expect and disappoint?"

"Honestly, does not love in the real rugged world also bear, care and nurture?"


Apr 25, 2018

Conversation starter!

Picture Credit: Myself!


When they ran into each other after being busy in their lives for years, the Angel and the Devil greeted one another and hoped to find the right conversation starter.

"How are you?"

"Happy, sad, unsure, confused, exhilarated, broken, joyous, afraid, thrilled, jealous, healthy, perverted, grateful - in varying proportions at various times. Sometimes surprised that though shades of my moods contradict themselves, they co-exist!"

"Oh, I hope I got the apt conversation starter."

"Well, how about you?"

"Neither all those emotions at once, rarely any specific emotion at once. A chaotic simultaneous amalgamation of emotions on the non-linear spectrum of human life, bathed in shades of celebration, amazement, existence, monotony, frustration and fragility!"

"I guess it is a hell of a conversation starter!"


Mar 29, 2018

ದೃಷ್ಟಿಯ ಸತ್ಯತೆ




ಕುರುಡಾಗಿದ್ದ ಸುಖ ದುಃಖಗಳು ಕಣ್ಣಾಸ್ಪತ್ರೆಯ ಕನ್ನಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ತಮ್ಮ ಪ್ರತಿಬಿಂಬ ಕಂಡು ತಾವು ಬೇರ್ಪಡಿಸಲಾಗದ ಸಯಾಮಿ ಅವಳಿಗಳೆಂದು ತಿಳಿದಾಗ ತಮ್ಮ ದೃಷ್ಟಿಯ ಸತ್ಯತೆಯನ್ನೇ ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸ ಹೊರಟವು.

(Seeing their reflection for the first time in the mirror at the eye-hospital, conjoined twins, Happiness and Sorrow, which were blind all these days, went on to question the truth of their vision!)

Mar 12, 2017

A Conversation


"Why do you live so far away from the city?," she asked her grandfather who was keenly observing the dog drive away the band of monkeys which had sneaked into the farm.

"Because, my darling, home is where the heart is."

"But, why is your heart here? The city is the epitome of human civilization. Such harmonious living together of diverse cultures built on the unconscious cooperation of invisible strangers, Infinite opportunities - to learn, to explore and to express. Despite the one in thousand instants of tumult or insensitivity, I love the city for its magic."

"When you were a child, you used to tell me that you loved the city for its lights and colors. Nice to see your tastes evolving. Lucky that you have your home in the city, which you love and hopefully where your heart is. You too will over time understand that we can simultaneously love multiple things, sometimes even contradictory ones and one's heart need not necessarily be with what one loves."

"The more older you get, the more disagreeable you seem! What are you doing here? What meaning does your life have in rearing these dogs and chasing those monkeys?"

"Whatever meaning human existence has, if any. I sometimes wonder if we are like the dogs here. Assuming the boundary of a piece of land to be the territory to guard and chase monkeys there. If suppose we happen to catch a monkey, then not finding in it what we are looking for, we chase the other monkeys all over again. Maybe we are not looking for anything in the monkeys but it is simply in our nature to chase them."

"Despite the thoughts being intriguing, I can't agree with them Grandpa. "

"Then, my love, maybe we can agree to disagree."

Jan 19, 2017

Judge!

PC: http://mentirasquetevoucontando.blogs.sapo.pt/
("Critic" is from Greek word "kritikos" meaning "able to judge or discern.")

"Unless we are very, very careful,we doom each other by holding onto images of one another based on preconceptions that are in turn based on indifference to what is other than ourselves.”
  - Psychologist-turned-artist Anne Truitt 
 

The angel and the devil were being critics of human actions -
"It was a good thing."
"No, it was a bad thing."
"But it was the best thing to be done there."
"It was inappropriate to be done there."
"She had the courage to stand against the mob."
"She did not heed to the wisdom of the crowd."
God who was busy playing with the stars asked them - "Why did she do so?"
The angel and devil in unison - "Maybe because...."
God - "Not your assumption of why. But the reality of why."
In unison - "How would we know?"
God - "What were her circumstances which drove her to do so?"
Again in unison - "How would we know?"
God - "Then what she did was good or bad?"
Again in mechanical unison - "How would we....!!!"

Nov 26, 2016

Precious and lost!


“Every one of us is losing something precious to us. Lost opportunities, lost possibilities, feelings we can never get back again. That’s part of what it means to be alive.”
― Haruki Murakami, 
("Kafka on the Shore")


"You look sad, depressed and lost, why is it so?"
"Because it is precious and I lost it."
"Then come let us go and find it."
"No, let us not find it back."
"Why? Isn't it precious enough to get it back?"
"It is precious now, only because it is lost."
"Ah! One of those which become precious only because they can't be got back."

Nov 6, 2016

Afraid



"Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go."
- T.S. Eliot, Preface to Harry Crosby, Transit of Venus (1931), p. ix.

It was a gala party. So many guests, all grinning at one another, greeting with joy and at places hugging despite the envy.

At the table in a corner, we three sat boozing after eavesdropping at random tables on a lot of ludicrous gossips.

The angel and the devil too, due to the lack of coherence to discuss any interesting subject as we boozed, took to deliberate on the idea of my marriage.
"How sweet of your human friends, at each table as they greeted you, they were all concerned of your marriage."
"But how does your marriage concern them all? Seems like it is an easy, lazy conversation starter."
"Best to ignore it, we humans just tend to feed on the gossips of others' lives as we loaf around in such parties."

As we had more pegs the angel and the devil too, like those success-coaches, told me to surmount my fear and take a leap of faith.
"Maybe they were all right. You are afraid. Afraid of getting married. And hence succumb and fret your days in loneliness."
"Maybe they were all afraid. Afraid of having to live alone and succumbed to that pressure and surrendered to marriage."
"Maybe like them all, we three are also on a high and unnecessarily philosophizing another civilizational social convention which could well be followed for thousand various reasons in various cases."

Oct 13, 2016

The problem



It was a typical Angel and Devil problem!
"What is the problem?"
"I am not sure if I am myself or what I think of myself"
"Then is the thought the problem?"
"I wonder if it is the urge to think?"
"Urge to think of oneself?"
"To think of oneself as one thing?!"

Jun 29, 2016

Dark desert battles!

Original Painting by Auguste Glaize (1807-1893)
"The Women of Gaul" - An episode during the Roman invasion of Gaul, Painting done in 1851



       It was a dark night. A stormy one. Desert storms are bad, they are brutal too. I struggled my way to the high moral ground and preached to my fellow warriors. Some cheered, some booed. That is how it is, I thought. Energized by the assumption that I had fuelled their spirits, I bravely battled the enemy all through the night.
       As the Sun came above the horizon in the early hours, I saw the landscape. A freaking sight! The moral high ground I supposed in the night was only a heap of corpses of my own men! The ground in the desert is all fleeting. As my own men stare at me and their stare terrifies me more than that of the enemy forces, it feels as if the sand flows and where I thought was the high ground in the night, now seems to be the pit of my downfall.

Mar 25, 2016

Humans!

Human beings: Contradictory ideas and Individual character??
PC: Myself!

"What makes human beings interesting is that they continue to hold contradictory ideas together at the same time, and that mix is what constitutes the individual character." 
- Orhan Pamuk


Rare was this moment! Very rare indeed. As if it was a blue moon night! The angel and the devil were on the same page on this issue.
"An idealist, a romantic, a poet - far far away from reality!"
"An opportunist, a realist, a politician - scheming to get things done!"
"At times so courageous and bold; at times so timid and meek"
"Inconsistent. Simple in certain tastes, lavish in others."
"Kind and cruel"
"Mind and heart"
"Unreasonable, yet at times pragmatic!"
"Foolish, yet at times the spark of brilliance!"
"Why aren't they what they are?"
"Why can't we predict their behaviour?"
Taking a deep breath of exasperation, the angel and the devil in this extremely rare moment of agreement said in unison - " Probably, because they are humans!"


Feb 3, 2016

The perfect shot!

camera obscura: The dark chamber!! (PC: Myself)
"Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding it still." 
- Dorothea Lange

      In the snow laden valleys when we would all sleep wrapped in the dark cold nights, she would stay awake. Shivering in the cold, she would wait for inspiration to strike her. Though she was smart, we thought she was eccentric since in the absence of light no photographer could capture any picture but this lass would stay up all night with her age old camera as if to capture a miracle. We would ask her often what was it that she intended to capture and with a sheepish smile she would say "the perfect shot". We even joked among ourselves that she was an occult mystery.
      The camera in its Latin origins - "camera obscura" means the dark chamber, where in all the action happens only by trapping light. Ambrose Bierce once called photograph as "a picture painted by the sun without instruction in art." But this lass stayed up in the dark nights, where darkness loomed large with increasing cold and there was meagre light if any, and for the sunlight, there was none. How could she ever capture light in its absence? And we were bewildered at her audacity of calling the absurd as the perfect!!
        This was the every night usual drama for us. Until, one fine night, she decided to call it a day! We were all surprised. How could this stubborn lass give up her pursuit of the 'perfect shot' over a night? She was hell bent on capturing the perfect shot and had doggedly battled all of us, the naysayers for so long! But then she had decided to abandon her pursuit on that fateful night of torrential rainfall. On insisting why she had made the decision, she showed us what she had captured. A bright shot of the valley. But in the midnight, at the exact strike of lightning! The timing was so perfect that until we were told of it, none of us could recognize it was captured in the midnight and not in the day! There was no sign that could tell us that it was a picture clicked at the precise moment of flash in almost pitch darkness. Nothing that hinted at her persistence; absolutely no clue of her perseverance. To the onlooker, it was just another picture of the valley. Nothing less, nothing more!
      Was it the irony of perfection that disillusioned one of its striving champion from its earnest pursuit? Or was it that she had found in her pursuit of perfection such profoundness that we weren't able to grasp as we had failed to appreciate the timing of the "perfect shot"!?

Nov 1, 2015

Reality vs Morality


PC: http://www.doodlerblog.com/

At times the angel and the devil discover their spirit of questioning and it was another of such instance on a breezy moonlit night.
"How is it that at times one among us is the angel and the other devil?"
"Is it because we at times succumb to the raw fervour of reality and at times manage to stand up to the high echelons of ethics and morality?"
"Then how is God always God and Satan always Satan?"
"Have we ever seen them together?"

Oct 30, 2015

Thin line?

Tears and Laughters (PC: Myself)

  "This is my last message to you: in sorrow seek happiness."
                                                        - Fyodor Dostoevsky 
                                                            ("Brother's Karamazov")

The devil and the angel were in moods at extreme ends of the spectrum. One was overwhelmed with joy, while the other seemed deep in sorrow.
"You look sad, What happened?"
"I am not very sure. But maybe it is because I got all that I wished for."
"Oh, but that is precisely the reason I am so happy. I too got all that I wished for."
"Happy for you!"
"But how does it make you sad?"
"The way it makes you happy."
"Is it a very thin line?"
"Maybe. I don't know."

Oct 1, 2015

A tap's predicament

     
Is there a tap that doesn't ever leak?

     I am a tap which believes it is leak proof in a system where I perceive it is pertinent to plug the leaks. I look at other taps and I understand there are two kinds of taps. One - the closed taps and the second - the open taps.
     As time passes by, I notice it is not all as black and white as I supposed it to be. There are these taps too which are neither closed nor open! They leak!! And a good number of us leak. Some are made to leak I am told. Some are applied with leak proof solutions and yet they refuse to mend their leaking habits. 
     Years on, I understand not all taps leak in the same way. The leakage pattern varies on their position in the pipeline. And I gradually realize no observation is a rule but has many shades and exceptions to it. I also get to see that if a tap is stubbornly leak proof, it is either broken or removed. If that is not feasible, the flow is so strong that the pipeline itself develops cracks through which it leaks.
      The leakage seems to be inevitable. I wonder why no tap can last its life without ever leaking. Years, decades and centuries go by and one day I suddenly realize if the goal of the system was to plug leaks, why on earth were we made taps!?
      As my existential crisis haunts me further, I wonder if we are all something else in the garb of taps or are we simply a design engineer's blunder? Or is it that the goal of the system is not to plug leaks but something else and we have wrongly assumed for ourselves a role of absurd importance? As I entangle myself more into the complexity, I am suddenly dismantled and the new generation electronic water plugs are put in place to prevent the leakage of what they think is water!

Apr 14, 2015

Gift of democracy!

   
Whom to curse as I am made to wait?? (PC: Myself)
  
"The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting." - Charles Bukowski

     The citizen looked blank because he knew not whom to curse. He was waiting for change and reform since the day they were promised to him.  When he explained his predicament, I too was perplexed and shared his confusion. If it was an autocracy or an anarchy or something of that sort, we could have cursed someone specific. But damn it, this was democracy!!
     He clearly knew he was a citizen, a part of the public; he had to find a public servant in a public office to attend to his problems. Irrespective of being part of a major or minor socio-religious group from which he derived a sense of identity, his existence as an individual citizen had bestowed on him the right to demand for the redressal of his grievances.
    But all that the much hyped and promised democracy offered was a government with its ministers and officers. The guarded government spaces, the rigid bureaucratic structures and the erudite officer elite who manned them! Among these government officers where were the public servants the citizen had to approach? Whom was he to fight with for justice? Whom was he to curse for his plight? Had the public sphere vanished into thin air as the reach and spread of the government had widened by leaps and bounds?
        Has it always been a struggle for the survival of the 'public' at the mercy of the 'government'? Or is it the modern 'gift of democracy'!?

Nov 9, 2014

The Gardener

PC: Kotresh H R

     "Wholeness does not mean perfection: it means embracing brokenness as an integral part of life."  - Parker Palmer

    He must be over seventy, though I did not ask him how old he was. He played a dual role. He was the gardener and the guard of the garden. He has been so for over two decades now. He dons these roles on behalf of the appointed government employees who pay him a part of their salary and visit once a while to cater to the paper work. This ad-hoc adjustment, an innovation at the lower rungs of Indian bureaucratic machinery, has existed in varying fashions. He recounts how he has been in and out of this work depending on the preference of those who are actually appointed to these posts. His pay is at their discretion, though in the recent years he thinks he is usually paid enough to sustain himself. 
     As we sit in the shade of the trees, he has watered and nourished these trees for over a score of years now, I ask him what he feels of the career he has built for himself. I get back an empty stare. He doesn't know what a career is. How foolish of me to ask so! To him, it is life. Not career. I curse my stupid obsession with careers. I am again reminded of what Cheryl Strayed wrote - "Don't lament so much about how your career is going to turn out. You don't have a career. You have a life."
       While I was framing questions in my mind, he sat silent. It seemed as though in silence he had found solace. He only replied, did not speak much. I didn't know what to ask of his job, though it had very much captured my interest. I was not sure if I could actually ask him of his job satisfaction. I finally asked him if he never looked for any other job during these years or was it like he loved gardening? Again a stare! But this time, he did open up. He explained - "I did look for jobs in the early years but this turned out to be easy and also paid me to a decent extent. After doing it for so many years, it has become part of my routine. Nothing like loving gardening but neither do I have problems with it." Silence again. 
       I felt the conversation was going nowhere. I was about to take his leave. But he began to speak again, this time by his own initiative - "You know, most of them who talk to me talk of the garden, the plants, the flowers, the rains and so on. Few talk of me and my job. Those who do, roughly fall into two categories. One, those who say I am lucky to be in this beautiful garden, such a beautiful job. Others pity my condition. They feel I am caged and chained in this lonely place for all my life. These all do raise questions in me. If I was timid not to explore the world or if I was lucky to tend to the garden? If I was lazy to find better prospects of earning? What if I would be thrown out when the next transfer takes place and the new employee may choose not to be my employer?"
"So the questions still haunt you?"
"Not actually. Now I am at peace."
"Oh, so you did find answers to those questions!"
"No, I have realized not all questions need to be answered."

Nov 6, 2014

Once an ocean...

PC: http://psalmoines.com

और भी दुःख हैं ज़माने में मुहब्बत के सिवा
राहतें और भी हैं वस्ल की राहत के सिवा
मुझ से पहली सी मुहब्बत मेरे महबूब न माँग !
                                            - Faiz Ahmed Faiz

(Other pains too exist in the world, beyond love.
Pleasures too than that of the union of lovers.
Ask me not, my Beloved, for that love, I once had.)

     Once upon a time, like in those classic fairy tales, "love" happened. And then as in the stark reality of human existence, "life" happened.
     Years later when we both met, she stared into my eyes. She told me though there were traces of love, she could not find that ocean of love that I once had in me for her.
     I told her the ocean of love was for what she then was and not for what she now is.
     She corrected me when she said her concern was not if the ocean of love is still there for her, but that she could not find the ocean at all.
     I told her the ocean of love was in him who I then was and not in him who I now am.
     She asked me what happened to the ocean which was so vast and majestic.
     I told her the traces that she found now in me were what was back then the ocean.
     She was surprised and asked me how was it possible that the vast ocean of those days now seemed to be only traces.
     I told her maybe like me, she too had drowned in that ocean of life, the awareness of whose infiniteness shakes our perspectives so much so that what seemed oceans then, seem to be mere traces now.

Oct 23, 2014

Beautiful flower?

PC: Myself!!
Neither am I what I look, nor am I what you see!!


"The red flower looks so beautiful."
"The flower which emits red color looks so beautiful."
"It is a red flower."
"It is a flower which emits red color."
"It is because I see it in red, I call it a red flower."
"It is because it rejects red and absorbs all other colors, I call it a flower that emits red."
............
As the angel and the devil were obsessed in associating the identity of the flower to the red they perceived in different senses, a bee listening to their conversation laughed at how blind they were in calling a flower, devoid of patterns as beautiful!!

____________________________
 
Bees are red-blind. The visible spectrum, for a bee, stretches from 650 mu to 300 mu, so it can distinguish only four different colors in the visible spectrum: yellow, blue-green, blue, and ultraviolet. #
The patterns of flowers are thought to attract bees to flowers. *

#http://www.sewanee.edu/Chem/Chem%26Art/Detail_Pages/ColorProjects_2003/Crone/index.htm
*http://www.rit-mcsl.org/fairchild/WhyIsColor/Questions/5-3.html 

Aug 20, 2014

Observations

PC: Myself!!

Few sympathize my tears, Few complement the sparkle.
It is only a speck of dust that has left me misty eyed.


The Angel and the Devil were out in the forest. Employing all their skills of reasoning and experience, they were noting down their observations.
One wrote - "She is too very emotional. She sheds tears in pain, unable to bear the Sun's wrath!"
The other wrote - "She is so rational. She sparkles, determined as she stands strong in the Sun!"